Court Rules About Asbestos Exposure Evidence

Friday, June 12th, 2009

Springfield, IL—The Illinois Supreme Court recently handed down a decision in favor of a defendant in an asbestos lawsuit.

Clarence Nolan brought the suit against heating-product manufacturer Weil-McLain, alleging that he was exposed to asbestos-containing products as a result of the company’s negligence. Nolan developed mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive cancer that is linked exclusively to asbestos exposure, and later died.

Weil-McLain was the final defendant remaining after 11 others were dismissed or settled out of court, and the company had first attempted, but was not allowed, to present evidence regarding the other companies’ asbestos-containing products. They claimed that exposure to asbestos at the other companies was the “sole proximate cause” of Nolan’s death.

In legal terminology, a “proximate cause” is one which sets off a natural, continuous chain of events leading to a definite conclusion.

The Supreme Court ruled last week that the jury ought to have heard evidence of Nolan’s exposure to other asbestos products. The court overturned both appellate and circuit court decisions in the case.

A jury which had heard the trial against Weil-McLain had decided in 2004 to award $2.4 million to Nolan’s widow. The amount was later halved, since the family had already received $1.2 million from the other defendants.

In a statement, the court said, “In sum, the exclusion of evidence of decedent’s other exposures to asbestos eliminated evidence of alternative causes for decedent’s injuries, improperly preventing defendant from supporting its sold proximate cause of defense.”

A new trial will now be held in circuit court.

The decision to allow all evidence to be admitted in an asbestos case is an important one, especially for defendants. When a worker has multiple avenues of exposure to asbestos, lawyers agree, it’s important that all relevant information be revealed to the jury in order for them to assign causality and award punitive damages in the most equitable manner possible.

Asbestos, which is a naturally occurring mineral fiber with great tensile strength and resistance to heat and other damaging elements, was commonly used in the manufacture of building products and for other industrial and commercial uses in the mid-20th century. It is, however, a known carcinogen; exposure to it, especially repeated exposure over a period of time, can lead to deadly diseases such as mesothelioma, asbestosis and pleural disease.


Bookmark This Article:
| del.icio.us: Delicious | Digg: Digg | Technorati: Technorati | Newsvine: Seed this article | Reddit: Add to Reddit | Furl: Add to furl | | Stumble Upon: Stumble This Article | Yahoo!: YahooMyWeb | Google: Google |


This entry was posted on Friday, June 12th, 2009 at 1:12 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


Leave a Reply

Free case consultation

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, contact us using the form below to speak with a mesothelioma consultant, free of charge.